![]() |
|
|
|
||
|
|
![]() PLASMA and LCD - the FACTS When it comes to finding out more about plasma and LCD, there are a number of myths out there that can be confusing. Here, Panasonic responds to some misconceptions and offers new information.
The energy consumption of both is actually about the same in normal operating conditions. An LCD screen consumption is constant whereas with Plasma it fluctuates according to the brightness of a scene, eg when a scene is predominantly dark , a Plasma will use less energy. All in all the energy efficiency evens out for Plasma and LCD.
Does Flat Panel TV need re-gasing? No. Plasma gases are inert and sealed within tiny cells that are sandwiched between glass plates. There is never any need to re-charge or refill the Plasma.
The life span for both is dependent on viewing habits, but if both are watched for the same duration, one would expect the life span to be approximately the same, 60 000 hours, roughly twice the life span of older CRT technology. In Summary : don't believe all that you hear The new European research shown below clearly shows an overwhelming preference for Plasma, citing deeper blacks, richer colour reproduction and critically, the capability to accurately display fast moving action as key drivers. These findings, coupled with the Fast Facts above, dispelling myths like shorter life, re-gasing and power consumption, conclusively support the case for Plasma when choosing a flat panel TV for the home. NEW EUROPEAN RESEARCH RESUTS : Plasma offer the best all-round viewing.
A majority of two to one rated Plasma as providing the best image quality and 72% felt that the best black quality was created by large Plasma screens. The research replicated the typical viewing conditions found in the home and produced very clear results. |
|
![]() |
||
Key statistics include
Note : Information related to the Panasonic Viera range. *Source GFK July and August 2006. Screen size above 33 inches Plasma or LCD for which room ? |
||
![]() |
|
|
|
||||||